Comments on: Game On | Deutsche Bank, Akerman Sentertfitt Sues Lynn Szymoniak’s Son With No Financial Interest In Her Case

By: Joe L'Amarca

Joe L'Amarca — Mon, 16 May 2011 19:11:45 +0000

Two of the most important words in our history (1st DEBASE ) (2nd UNITED STATES NOTE ) now read the coinage act of 1792 sec . nine it fixed the standard of measuring the U S Dollar and sec. nineteen it describes the penalty for committing fraud or debasing the value of it .
The legal tender act is a contract drafted by the criminal society to enslave all humanity on earth , do to the fact that the dollar still sounds the same ! but it does not have the value as described in sec. nine of the coinage act of 1792 . search the word ENGLISH in the bible concordance .
Now that you are in the Feudal system . In the feudal system, the nobles are the descendants of the officers who conquered the lands. The King was the Leader. The Counts or Barons were the Generals. Lesser Nobles were the Colonels and so on down the line. The same thing is happening in Cuba today. In Communism, all comrades are equal. As capitalism intrudes, the Generals become more equal. The Generals own the large tourist hotels. They get rich. The Colonels own less but are still well off. The average comrade lives in abject poverty.
In the feudal system, the nobles are the descendants of the officers who conquered the lands. The King was the Leader. The Counts or Barons were the Generals. Lesser Nobles were the Colonels and so on down the line. The same thing is happening in Cuba today. In Communism, all comrades are equal. As capitalism intrudes, the Generals become more equal. The Generals own the large tourist hotels. They get rich. The Colonels own less but are still well off. The average comrade lives in abject poverty.

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_are_the_nobles_in_the_feudal_system#ixzz1MXbjVgY2
The Trouble is that when We The People vote we should have a 3RD. contract for the constituents to sign , stating a minor penalty or capitol punishment for any fraud /abuse of their authority. without the check or balance in place they can legalize anything that they want and not ever be punished for !!!
Now do you understand the difference between the coinage act and the legal tender act ? . as long as you pay for anything with legalized debt notes thats what you bought is another debt , but when you pay with a United States Note . the debt is completed . The contract on the face of the paper currency states this note is legal tender for all public and private debts Ha how do you pay a debt by giving someone another Debt Note .???? When JFK realized that his executive Order 11110 he ordered a U S Note Printed , Remember that guy that chased the money changers from the front his palace ? he got crucified ,remember congressmen McDonald he voted against the I M F fund , remember Pope John Paul ! he was going to return all the wealth that the Vatican defrauded from the people . So when it pertains to money ! for the good of your health please leave that to the Banksters Gangsters. You May Fine !!!

By: Maggie May

Maggie May — Sun, 15 May 2011 23:41:02 +0000

In reply to Randolph Frodsham.

I AGREE WITH YOU AS WEL!!! ALSO…………..

By: Randolph Frodsham

Randolph Frodsham — Sun, 15 May 2011 23:21:32 +0000

Don’t mis-read me. this is obsurd. But it is also amusing in a sad sorta way. Now I don’t claim to know or understand the laws in the state where Szymoniak lives, but I can tell you that in California, to attempt to foreclose on a non-borrower/non-owner of a property is an exercise in absurdity. Oh, you can take anyone to court for damn near anything here, but whether you get you result is the issue. What I see is utter desparation on the part of Duetsch – they appear to be so desparate, they’re acting stupid.

By: Officer of the Law

Officer of the Law — Sat, 14 May 2011 21:34:40 +0000

Smooth move. Filing a frivolous claim against a person whom the Florida court does not have jurisdiction over in order to harass them is unethical, but of course, the banksters’ minions follow orders and they know that the banksters own the crooks who run the Florida Bar.

By: maggie may

maggie may — Sat, 14 May 2011 17:47:20 +0000

IM WARNING U FELLOW BLOGGERS IM A WITTLE MISCHEVIOUS TODAY:)

By: heather

heather — Sat, 14 May 2011 17:43:00 +0000

hey akermann senterfitt. i am right here. Isn’t enough that in my case you presented forged documents, false signaures, forged signatures on promissory notes, and a fake affadavit.. I would love to help take Akermann down. Time to go. Ask me how. I have already filed a complaint with the Fl AG but you know how effective they are. Serious. Isn’t it fraud if you used forged docs to steal property? The people that matter here on this board know who I am and I would be happy to share everything I have with them just to see Akermann go.

By: Tim Bryant

Tim Bryant — Sat, 14 May 2011 16:09:57 +0000

In reply to Tim Bryant.

Lynn may want to check out this article, as it may apply in her case.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/04/washington-ag-investigates-new-foreclosure-abuse-front-trustee-non-compliance.html

By: Tim Bryant

Tim Bryant — Sat, 14 May 2011 15:49:35 +0000

In reply to Tim Bryant.

Forgot another little history tidbit….John Hancock was also the President of the United States of the Congress Assembled under the Articles of Confederation from 1785-86. He was the original George W. Bush….LOL

By: Tim Bryant

Tim Bryant — Sat, 14 May 2011 15:42:22 +0000

It should also be noted that this is also fraud in the sale and representation of securities by Deutsche Bank, an SEC violation. She should counter claim against the entire trust and it’s investors. This is no longer passive activity, required to maintain either REMIC or Trust status under IRS guidelines.

Lynn, file a complaint with the SEC and the IRS. This BS with “innocent” trusts and investors has gone on long enough. I have been submitting evidence to Katherine Hsu ( HSUK@SEC.GOV ), about this garbage with RMBSs. Keep your chin up and keep fighting. The greatest enemy to these fraudsters is the TRUTH.

Also, check your mortgage for the section that says “Applicable Law”. It usually says that the contract is governed by Federal law and the laws of the jurisdiction the property is located. If the securitization, and subsequently the PSA, are applicable under the laws of a different state, their is no recourse that can be had by the trust against you. I will also bet that the PSA states after a certain amount of time, the trusts only recourse is against the seller of the loans. Check these out.

There is also a little talked about law, called the E-Sign Act of 2000. An electronic “transferable record” is only legally valid given specific criteria are met. One is that it MUST be disclosed to the consumer. The other issue under this act is that ANY such “transferable record” that shows an entity as holding such record, gives the holder of record those same rights as a holder in due course. If your County land records, the MERS for homeowners database, and the SEC records show different holders of record, their is a legal controversy of Deutsche Bank’s legal standing to pursue this matter alone. All parties of interest MUST be joined to the proceedings for the judge to go forward.

By: Tim Bryant

Tim Bryant — Sat, 14 May 2011 15:21:04 +0000

In reply to Tim Bryant.

Unfortunately, we have no Jeffersons or Washingtons in our government. Elizabeth Warren is the closest we have. Our elected officials are weak and corrupt, and feel that their power is no longer derived by the people for the people.

It is up to us to make sure they live by the promises of the Constitution. We must hound as many people as we can to create a change in political will. Every miscarriage of justice, or sign of corruption must be reported to the media, not just here. Shame is a tremendous political motivator. Use this to your advantage to stand up for your rights, and hold the government accountable. If anyone needs a list of media contacts, email me at tbryant80@comcast.net