“You are improperly acting under the cloak of your authority … by publicly vilifying companies based on unconfirmed evidence,” LPS lawyer Joan Meyer wrote on Jan. 5, requesting an investigation into their tactics.

“Isn’t that defense 101? The opposing counsel complaining?” Edwards replied Friday.

~

The hits just keep on coming…

Now if only someone would look into the connections between the judges that ruled on the quash of the subpoena and the players involved, hint, hint…

~

 Accusations of Impropriety Rock Bondi’s Office

TALLAHASSEE – Eight months after she took office as a first-time elected official, Attorney General Pam Bondi is facing a management crisis replete with allegations of old-fashioned political interference in cases and a revolving door between lawyers and the companies they investigate.

An outside investigator is looking into the circumstances surrounding the May firings of foreclosure fraud investigators June Clarkson and Theresa Edwards. This week, another investigator abruptly resigned after giving the media a 16-page memo noting that two other high-profile lawyers in the attorney general’s office had taken jobs with companies under investigation, and accusing top management of interfering in an investigation of a prominent Tampa car dealership.

But the worst development for Bondi may be that the 10 active cases her office is investigating have been left in legal limbo, thanks to a court ruling earlier this year that has effectively curtailed her power to use the state’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act to investigate businesses engaging in foreclosure fraud.

Be sure to check out the rest here…

See, that is what happens when you try to protect the fraudsters. These rulings affect future cases to come, even outside of foreclosure world…

I was there at the hearing, I saw it go down, it should have been appealed to the FL Supreme Court…

Especially when another judge denied David Stern’s motion to quash in another circuit pertaining to the same circumstances…

Oh, and BTW. It was NOT June or Theresa that argued the case during oral arguments that lost this appeal. They were “replaced” by someone in the administration who did not know what they were talking about. No offense to him, but he just did not have the background and the knowledge like J&T did. It appeared that’s the way the administration wanted it though, to us anyway.

I’m sure an investigative journalist can figure out what went down here…

~

4closureFraud.org