Florida Supreme Court Oral Arguments Live Thursday May 10, 2012 @ 9:00AM EST
Florida Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Roman Pino v. Bank of New York
After The Bank of New York Mellon began foreclosure proceeding on Mr. Pino’s home, Mr. Pino alleged the bank had filed fraudulent documents in that proceeding. The bank voluntarily dismissed the foreclosure proceeding and filed a new foreclosure case five months later. Mr. Pino asked the trial court to strike the bank’s voluntary dismissal of the first case, arguing such a move was not permitted as a way to avoid fraud allegations. The trial court denied his motion. The Fourth District Court of Appeal upheld that ruling. The 4th DCA also asked this Court to rule on the trial court’s power in such a situation.
CLICK VIDEO BUTTON TO VIEW LIVE STREAM @ 9:00AM
CLICK VIDEO BUTTON TO VIEW LIVE STREAM @ 9:00AM
If you miss the live case, view it from the archive at http://wfsu.org/gavel2gavel/archives/index.html
Individual briefs and other documents in Acrobat format:
2012
Filed_01-06-2012_Order_Amicus.pdf
Filed_01-06-2012_Order_Kaufman.pdf
Filed_01-12-2012_Motion_Extension.pdf
Filed_01-12-2012_Motion_to_Toll_Time.pdf
Filed_01-12-2012_Order_Extension.pdf
Filed_01-23-2012_ALTA_Motion.pdf
Filed_01-23-2012_Mortgage_Bankers_Notice.pdf
Filed_01-24-2012_Notice_Amended_Certification.pdf
Filed_01-25-2012_BONY_Answer.pdf
Filed_01-25-2012_BONY_Answer_Appendix.pdf
Filed_01-25-2012_BONY_Request_Arguments.pdf
Filed_01-26-2012_Order_Amicus_ALTA.pdf
Filed_01-26-2012_Order_Mortgage_Bankers.pdf
Filed_02-03-2012_Amicus_FLTA.pdf
Filed_02-03-2012_Amicus_MBA.pdf
Filed_02-21-2012_Motion_Extension_Time.pdf
Filed_02-21-2012_Notice_Change_of_Firm.pdf
Filed_02-21-2012_Request_Toll_Time.pdf
Filed_02-24-2012_Motion_to_Strike.pdf
Filed_02-24-2012_Reply_Brief.pdf
Filed_03-02-2012_Order_Granting_Motions.pdf
Filed_03-05-2012_Nieves_Memorandum.pdf
Filed_03-09-2012_Nieves_Order.pdf
Filed_04-23-2012_Notice_of_Appearance_Lundergan.pdf
2011:
Filed_04-08-2011_Notice_to_Invoke_Jursdiction.pdf
Filed_04-11-2011_Acknowledgment.pdf
Filed_04-11-2011_High_Profile_Order.pdf
Filed_04-15-2011_Scheduling_Order.pdf
Filed_05-09-2011_Motion_Extension.pdf
Filed_05-13-2011_Motion_Toll_Time.pdf
Filed_06-03-2011_Record_on_Appeal.pdf
Filed_06-13-2011_Initial_Brief.pdf
Filed_06-13-2011_Initial_Brief_Appendix.pdf
Filed_06-28-2011-Motion_Extension.pdf
Filed_06-28-2011-Motion_Toll_Times.pdf
Filed_07-01-2011_Order_Extension.pdf
Filed_07-25-2011_Stipulated_Dismissal.pdf
Filed_12-13-2011_Kahn_Notice.pdf
Filed_12-13-2011_Kahn_Notice_of_Filing.pdf
Filed_12-15-2011_BONY_Motion_for_Extension.pdf
Filed_12-15-2011_BONY_Motion_to_Toll_Time.pdf
Filed_12-15-2011_Rogow_Notice_of_Appearance.pdf
Filed_12-20-2011_Motion_Amicus_Brief_FPG-USA.pdf
Filed_12-21-2011_Respondents_Objection_to_Amicus_Brief.pdf
Filed_12-22-2011_Order_Amicus_Denied.pdf
Filed_12-22-2011_Order_Granting_Extension_Time.pdf
Filed_12-27-2011_Kaufman_Amicus.pdf
Filed_12-27-2011_Kaufman_Amicus_Brief.pdf
Filed_12-27-2011_Kaufman_Motion.pdf
Filed_12-28-2011_BONY_Consent.pdf
Filed_12-30-2011_Kaufman_Amended_Motioin.pdf
~
Bravo , Amanda !
Notice how these Supreme Court judges constantly interrupted the Ice’s attorney yet kept very quiet while the sheister old fart attorney for the bank spoke. Canady was especially quiet for the bank’s attorney.
This will go no where. Changing the law would mean more work for the court and these judges look like they do not want to work nor care too much for the homeowner.
Only Judge Pariente seemed to be fair and somewhat sympathetic to the homeowner, that can not afford legal counsel.
Yes your are correct. It was making me so mad! I hope it was just a strong case of wanting the truth. I then noticed most of judges stayed quite for the Banksters attorneys. Maybe it was because one judge was already giving him a hard time, or it was because the other justices already made up their mind, to rule in favor of the banks. If this is the case. This proves are whole judicial system in Florida is CORRUPT! I hope something good comes from this, but I dont know if that will be the case.
817.54 Obtaining of mortgage, mortgage note, promissory note, etc., by false representation.—Any person who, with intent to defraud, obtains any mortgage, mortgage note, promissory note or other instrument evidencing a debt from any person or obtains the signature of any person to any mortgage, mortgage note, promissory note or other instrument evidencing a debt by color or aid of fraudulent or false representation or pretenses, or obtains the signature of any person to a mortgage, mortgage note, promissory note, or other instrument evidencing a debt, the false making whereof would be punishable as forgery, shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.