The Story of Elliot – Fraudulent Foreclosure
By Dan McGookey
After handling hundreds of foreclosure cases involving securitized loans, I can safely say that every single securitized loan transaction involves fraud of some sort. Sometimes I shudder to think how many millions of families have lost their homes through foreclosure, when they could have saved them by pointing out their bank’s fraud, if only they had been able to find and expose it. Of course, the challenge in being able to do so varies with each case.
One of the most glaring examples of bank fraud came to my attention recently when I got a visit from Elliot. Elliot had just been sued for foreclosure by Bank of New Yorkshire, as Trustee of a securitized trust established in 2002. What that means is that in that year Elliot’s loan passed through a number of different hands and ended up bundled with thousands of other loans in a loan pool or trust. The purpose of this process is to allow banks such a Bank of New Yorkshire to make enormous profits by selling stock in the loan pool at many times the true value of the loans.
Having been established in 2002, the trust supposedly owning Elliot’s loan was required to have acquired it that year. On the other hand, a cursory examination of Elliot’s foreclosure Complaint, with an alleged copy of his promissory note attached, showed an endorsement from the loan originator, BNK Mortgage Company to Bank of New Yorkshire, on April 19, 2012, only days prior to the filing of the Complaint, and almost ten years after it was required to be placed in the Trust. Obviously, the endorsement, which appears on a separate instrument called an “allonge”, is bogus for that reason alone.
But there’s more; much more. The endorsement on the allonge is that of a loan servicer, OCEAN Loan Servicing. Thus, to believe the paperwork submitted with the foreclosure Complaint, the foreclosing party, Bank of New Yorkshire in effect transferred Elliot’s loan to itself. To condone this practice would essentially open the floodgates to the possibility of anyone stepping forward and, through fraudulent paperwork, claiming they owned your loan, allowing them to foreclose on your home. Scary stuff.
On top of all this, a Google search reveals that BNK Mortgage, the party on whose behalf OCEAN endorsed the note in 2012, closed its doors and shut down in 2007. Thus, the entity supposedly transferring the loan to the foreclosing party had been out of existence 4 years before it executed the transfer documents.
However it gets even worse. Only a year earlier in Elliot’s bankruptcy case, Bank of New Yorkshire produced, under oath, a totally different promissory note, with a different endorsement, in support of its claims of ownership of Elliot’s loan. In other words, Bank of New Yorkshire has lied in at least one court proceeding, if not two. Beyond all this, both versions of the note are irreconcilable with the express wording of the Trusts’s Prospectus, its governing document, in that the Prospectus represents that Elliot’s note was passed into the Trust by a “Depositor,” which was not BNK.
Because Elliot’s loan is so rife with fraud, we have extremely powerful weapons at our disposal to fight his foreclosure. We may even file a counterclaim against Bank of New Yorkshire and OCEAN seeking damages and recovery of attorney fees. No matter what, the end result for Elliot will be highly favorable, which is only right, given the bank’s egregious conduct.
The lesson in Elliot’s story is this: Don’t assume the documents produced by your bank demonstrate that it is entitled to relief. The chances are extremely high that when tested, the bank’s case will wilt, in turn leading to its willingness to work with the homeowner to allow him or her to stay in the home.
Note from the author: If you have questions or comments regarding this or any Foreclosure Story article, please visit www.mcgookeylaw.com
~
I have a similar case with Deutche assigning to itself…years after the fact!!!
I would be careful of judging those third world countries!!! Many of them learned from the best as the stories unfolds…the USA! Also, there are third world countries and developing countries ( there is a difference) that do not even have mortgages and credit system as we do here and the people are not defrauded like this and they have recourse also with their laws.
We are angry, yes with the system here that is defrauding us of our constitutional rights and honouring thieves in high places but I also know of homeowners that actually participated in these mortgage frauds also that is why we need to be mature and objective in our analysis of why things are they way they are and why the banks are getting away or at least some of them are…
I have a case against BOA that reeks of the same fraud. I am drafting a motion to the court laying out each and every fraudulent act. I’ll keep everyone informed.
The bottomline is that there is no help for the defrauded homeowner. If you think the newly formed CFPB or the new Fraud Task Force is going to help you, the individual homeowner, you are wrong! They will direct you to HUD for a modification or tell you to obtain a private attorney to persue a fraud lawsuit, but they will not intervene on your behalf to stop a forclosure, even if it is fraud. The dirty little secret is that it will cost the homeowner tens of thousands of dollars to pursue a private lawsuit on their own in court, which the individual homeowner cannot afford. These agencies were put into place by and for the government to pursue banks that have defrauded the government ( mortgage backed securities – Fannie and Freddie) and force them to purchase back bad loans. As for you, the inividual consumer, you are on your own. Don’t be decieved by the new government propaganda that you will be helped by these new formed agencies. The bottomline, Justice is Bought! If you can not afford to pay$300.00/hr for legal defense, then you will never see justice prevail.
I have a good one, too.
Bank and its attorneys foreclosed on us without any notice.
They’re now trying to backtrack and are saying they “will foreclose” as home appears to be abandoned (it is not; non-judicial state).
However, I found the sheriff’s deed on file with the county. I’m still trying to figure out how they did that without actually publishing the notices and showing the sheriff/county the affidavits of publishing (oh yeah, they showed ’em the ones from more than a year ago – prior to foreclosure cancelation).
I’m a compliance “geek” in search of a crack attorney in MI to go over the fraud that starts with the beginning of this mortgage (including signatures that aren’t mine + ones that are copied badly…bottom letters missing) on top of this FRAUDclosure.
If nothing surprised you, then you shouldn’t be amazed at the getting away with it!
It’s what happens when the system is bought and paid for.
NOTHING SURPRISES ME. WHAT AMAZES ME IS THAT THEY GET AWAY WITH IT .
Our whole system is bought. We are as corrupt as Mexico and all those third world countries.