Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Issues Rule to Protect Consumers from Irresponsible Mortgage Lending
Rule Requires Lenders Ensure Borrowers Have the Ability to Repay Their Mortgage
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) adopted a new rule that will protect consumers from irresponsible mortgage lending by requiring lenders to ensure prospective buyers have the ability to repay their mortgage. The rule also protects borrowers from risky lending practices such as “no doc” and “interest only” features that contributed to many homeowners ending up in delinquency and foreclosure after the 2008 housing collapse.
“When consumers sit down at the closing table, they shouldn’t be set up to fail with mortgages they can’t afford,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Our Ability-to-Repay rule protects borrowers from the kinds of risky lending practices that resulted in so many families losing their homes. This common-sense rule ensures responsible borrowers get responsible loans.”
Leading up to the mortgage crisis, certain lenders originated mortgages to consumers without considering their ability to repay the loans. The gradual deterioration in underwriting standards led to dramatic increases in mortgage delinquencies and rates of foreclosures. What followed was the collapse of the housing market in 2008 and the subsequent financial crisis. The 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act created broad-based changes to how creditors make loans and included new ability-to-repay requirements, which the CFPB is charged with implementing.
Ability to Repay
In the years leading up to the financial crisis, lenders too often offered mortgages to consumers who could not afford them. Under the Ability-to-Repay rule announced today, all new mortgages must comply with basic requirements that protect consumers from taking on loans they don’t have the financial means to pay back. Among the features of the new rule:
- Financial information has to be supplied and verified: Lenders must look at a consumer’s financial information. A lender generally must document: a borrower’s employment status; income and assets; current debt obligations; credit history; monthly payments on the mortgage; monthly payments on any other mortgages on the same property; and monthly payments for mortgage-related obligations. This means that lenders can no longer offer no-doc, low-doc loans, where lenders made quick sales by not requiring documentation, then offloaded these risky mortgages by selling them to investors.
- A borrower has to have sufficient assets or income to pay back the loan: Lenders must evaluate and conclude that the borrower can repay the loan. For example, lenders may look at the consumer’s debt-to-income ratio – their total monthly debt divided by their total monthly gross income. Knowing how much money a consumer earns and is expected to earn, and knowing how much they already owe, helps a lender determine how much more debt a consumer can take on.
- Teaser rates can no longer mask the true cost of a mortgage: Lenders can’t base their evaluation of a consumer’s ability to repay on teaser rates. Lenders will have to determine the consumer’s ability to repay both the principal and the interest over the long term − not just during an introductory period when the rate may be lower.
Qualified Mortgages
Lenders will be presumed to have complied with the Ability-to-Repay rule if they issue “Qualified Mortgages.” These loans must meet certain requirements which prohibit or limit the risky features that harmed consumers in the recent mortgage crisis. If a lender complies with the clear criteria of a Qualified Mortgage, consumers will have greater assurance that they can pay back the loan. Among the features of a Qualified Mortgage:
- No excess upfront points and fees: A Qualified Mortgage limits points and fees including those used to compensate loan originators, such as loan officers and brokers. When lenders tack on excessive points and fees to the origination costs, consumers end up paying a lot more than planned.
- No toxic loan features: A Qualified Mortgage cannot have risky loan features, such as terms that exceed 30 years, interest-only payments, or negative-amortization payments where the principal amount increases. In the lead up to the crisis, too many consumers took on risky loans that they didn’t understand. They didn’t realize their debt or payments could increase, or that they weren’t building any equity in the home.
- Cap on how much income can go toward debt: Qualified Mortgages generally will be provided to people who have debt-to-income ratios less than or equal to 43 percent. This requirement helps ensure consumers are only getting what they can likely afford. Before the crisis, many consumers took on mortgages that raised their debt levels so high that it was nearly impossible for them to repay the mortgage considering all their financial obligations. For a temporary, transitional period, loans that do not have a 43 percent debt-to-income ratio but meet government affordability or other standards − such as that they are eligible for purchase by the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) − will be considered Qualified Mortgages.
There are two kinds of Qualified Mortgages that have different protective features for a consumer and different legal consequences for the lender. The first, Qualified Mortgages with a rebuttable presumption, are higher-priced loans. These loans are generally given to consumers with insufficient or weak credit history. Legally, lenders that offer these loans are presumed to have determined that the borrower had an ability to repay the loan. Consumers can challenge that presumption, though, by proving that they did not, in fact, have sufficient income to pay the mortgage and their other living expenses.
The second, Qualified Mortgages that have a safe harbor status, are generally lower-priced loans. They are generally prime loans that are given to consumers who are considered to be less risky. They will also offer lenders the greatest legal certainty that they are complying with the new Ability-to-Repay rule. Consumers can legally challenge their lender if they believe the loan does not meet the definition of a Qualified Mortgage.
The Ability-to-Repay rule does not affect the rights of a consumer to challenge a lender for violating any other federal consumer protection laws.
Today, the CFPB is also releasing proposed amendments to its Ability-to-Repay rule. These amendments would, among other things, exempt certain nonprofit creditors that work with low- and moderate-income consumers. The proposed amendments would also make exceptions for certain homeownership stabilization programs − such as those that offer loans made in connection with the Making Home Affordable program − which help consumers avoid foreclosure. The proposed amendments would also provide Qualified Mortgage status for certain loans made and held in portfolio by small creditors, such as community banks and credit unions. Finally, today’s proposed amendments invite comment on how to calculate loan origination compensation under the points and fees provision of Qualified Mortgages.
The proposed amendments, if adopted, would be finalized this spring and go into effect at the same time as the Ability-to-Repay rule in January 2014. The CFPB is dedicated to working with industry and consumers for a smooth transition to the new rule. To help creditors with compliance, the CFPB will, among other things, be publishing plain-language translations of the regulation for lenders in booklet and video form, issuing implementation guides, and, in coordination with other agencies, releasing materials that help lenders understand supervisory expectations. As the effective date approaches, the CFPB will give consumers information about their new rights under these rules.
The rule and proposed amendments will be available on Thursday at: http://www.consumerfinance.gov/regulations
A factsheet further explaining the new rule is at: http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201301_cfpb_ability-to-repay-factsheet.pdf
A summary of the final Ability-to-Repay rule is at: http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201301_cfpb_ability-to-repay-summary.pdf
SOURCE: http://www.consumerfinance.gov
~
Move along….nothing left to see here….NO…..That is not only wrong, that is criminal. There were and are numerous laws in place, and the criminals broke them with impunity …..NO SOCIAL JUSTICE FIXES FOR A QUADRULLION DOLLARS IN FRAUD BY THE FED & WALL STREET….MAKE THE CRIMINALS PAY BACK EVERYTHING THEY STOLE FROM THE U.S. TAXPAYERS….TIME FOR JUSTICE FOR THE STAKEHOLDERS….WE THE PEOPLE….THE REAL OWNERS OF AMERICA….NOT THESE HOODLUM FRAUDS WHO WANT US TO BELIEVE THEY HAVE A LEGAL RIGHT TO STEAL AND PLUNDER ALL OF OUR WEALTH AND HAND US THEIR UNSUSTAINABLE & MASSIVE FRAUD DEBTS….TBTF IS A LICENSE FOR THE FED TO STEAL …..A GIFT FROM THE TRAITOR POLITICIANS…TO ROB US OF EVERYTHING….
What about us homeowners that illegally lost their homes in 2008 when not in arrears? We sued paid $35,000 in legal fees and the Judge made an unethical Judgment not based on the Facts of Law. We live in a non-judicial state and the bank never sent a “Notice of Default” because we weren’t in arrears, they never sent a Notice of Foreclosure nor was the sale posted in the newspaper. We found out 43 days after the illegal sale when we got a 72 hour notice. We lost our home of 24 years, our retirement & life savings and we had a perfect payment history on an invalid loan. They home was bought with an INVALID CREDIT BID. I feel we were given a life sentence because this has consumed my life and I can’t afford to pay another attorney.
Well…they are years too late, and as a result, WE THE PEOPLE are “missing” a quadrillion + dollars of our wealth and millions of our businesses, livelihoods, pensions, and properties and property values have been stolen from us.
“IF” adopted is the big word there so we will see if they get their hands off the private property or the people in pirate fashion. we will see…no trust here …too much has been stolen sooooooo??? the doubt is huge so many deaths so much loss so little being done…very shameful of our government. And no restitution WHY? They do not walk the talk.