White House Tasks Itself With Controlling Speech On The Internet
The War of on Terror continues with a new grave threat – people writing things on the internet. The government is now trying to find ways to counter “online radicalization to violence” a phrase so broad it could mean practically anything.
From the White House.
The American public increasingly relies on the Internet for socializing, business transactions, gathering information, entertainment, and creating and sharing content. The rapid growth of the Internet has brought opportunities but also risks, and the Federal Government is committed to empowering members of the public to protect themselves against the full range of online threats, including online radicalization to violence.
Shorter: the internet is gaining in power and we have not figured out a way to dominate it yet, this scares us.
The White House website lists a flurry of groups from ever morphing “Al Qaeda” to “sovereign citizens” to [insert worst thing we can think of here]. These various and assorted people could, possibly, maybe write something that could, possibly, maybe make someone, somewhere, under some set of circumstances, become violent. How can you know anything unless you know everything?
But don’t worry according to the White House Fact Sheet the government will be “collaborating with industry” to help deal with the menace of free speech on the internet.
Rest here…
~
I’m try to think of a politically correct way of saying” Bank Of America stole My Home “Any Ideas ?
Collaborating with industry means being told what to do by industry. The law will be morphed (as it has been and is) to be used as a weapon. Remember, most of the stuff that was going on in Nazi Germany, wasn’t “illegal”. Peaceful dissent is the most effective counter we can have, the web is widely monitored, read, recorded, controlled, used against people, captured as evidence, used to fire people from jobs, data mined, marketed, bought and sold – and so on, as it stands – today.
The defintions provided in this latest crap on what speech needs to be controlled are vague and wide open, so once again, an obvious controlling over reach, heavily papered with so-called justification. Condemning a TBTF Bankster, the Government’s enabling capitulation and corruption, the harm we see to families daily. Is reporting on these things an act of terror? Depends on what careerist you ask.