CNN Money Video – Florida’s Foreclosure Robo-judges

Florida’s Foreclosure Robo-judges

Click Through to View

First Palm Beach County Had “No Widespread Problems.”

Now Duval has “No evidence, nothing has been presented to us in the 4th circuit that there is any fraud being perpetrated on the court.”

Yea, right…

Nice work CNN.

~

4closureFraud.org


Comments
7 Responses to “CNN Money Video – Florida’s Foreclosure Robo-judges”
  1. RAMONA says:

    you could tell children would be in the streets before BUSH was re-elected. It was god save us, save america. you could see it coming!! you would haveto have your head in the dirt notto see it

  2. John R. says:

    Someone needs to get into this judge’s own County Records database, find Assignments & Affidavits signed by known robo-signers, find the law in the state of Florida that says it’s a criminal offense if you, as a citizen, witness a felony and DON’T report it, put together the robo-signers signatures with one of the many well written articles about just what and who they are, and submit it to “The Authorities” en masse. Send it to the Sheriff, send it to all the Judges, make sure the Ag gets one, get one to the County Recorder and the Clerk of Courts.

    This judge just has his head up his _ss and it’s gonna take paper, paper and more paper and all of his friends knowing the truth too before he changes his mind. Damn shame. But now that he’s publicly stated his “opinion”, he’s going to be even harder to convince. So when convincing…. GO LARGE!

    John R

  3. hogwash says:

    Great video explaining the fraud. take a trip down the rabbit hole.

  4. PJDJ01 says:

    In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated “Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. … It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function — thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.”

    So… have the impartial functions of the court been directly corrupted by the banks’ behaviors? Statistically, I think you can make the argument that impartiality has been lost. But did the banks do it? Not according to this case. What about the Judges? Did they judges carry out their judicial function and remain impartial?

    The apparent still point hypothesized statistical would suggest impartiality has been lost. The Chicago sheriff suggests he see the error rate at 95%. How could this be… 95% error rate and nothing impartial about it? 95% and nothing systemic about it? I could see 10% , maybe 15%. But 95%? Some entity needs to establish and verify the statistics.

    Also, I think Judge Soud’s argument suggesting that homeowners that do not show up are in default and therefore need to be foreclosed upon is particularly weak. Most of these homeowners are broke and believe the message on the street: ‘homeowners always loose’. I have also heard people say that they trust that judge would not infringe on their rights just to support the banks. There is nothing impartial about Judge Soud’s thinking.

  5. Heather Minty says:

    I am a homeowner in Miami-Dade county who experienced the rocket docket first hand. I went to trial on Sept. 24, 2010. The judge, Judge Schwartz denied any proof of non defaut and did not allow me to challenge the ownership of the loan. There are “suspicious” signatures on my documents. I have been fighting this foreclosure for 5.5 years. I never was in default .I hired foreclosure defense lawyers. I spent $35,000.00 on personal legal fees until I lost my job in April 2010. I obtained another mortgage as a contigency now I find there are issues with that mortgage. I paid lawyers until I could not pay any more and defended myself pro se. The rocket docket is especially disgusting in Miami-Dade county. I was told by the judge that I wanted a “free house”. I have spent more than the original purchase price of this house and certainly countrywide /Bank of America has spent more on their first tier firm of Akerman Senterfitt.

    • yvonne says:

      Heather…who ws your attorney? And who was the judge?

    • ilouie says:

      Lawrence Schwartz is a CRIMINAL.. that imbecile should not be a judge.HItlet is a saint next to that piece of living shit. Him and the whore that married him. I wish this mother—– chokes on a piece of chicken..

Leave a Reply