NY JUDGE DENIES 127 FORECLOSURES PURSUANT TO ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER FROM CHIEF JUDGE, ROBO SIGNING

This comes in from StopForeclosureFraud…

MIND-BLOWING!! NY JUDGE DENIES 127 FORECLOSURES PURSUANT TO ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS FROM CHIEF JUDGE, ROBO SIGNING

Pursuant to an Administrative Order of the Chief Judge, dated October 20, 2010, all residential mortgage foreclosure actions require an affirmation from the attorney representing the plaintiff/lender/bank, as stated in the affirmation attached to this order, that he/she has inspected all documents.

The plaintiff is also directed on any future application to provide a copy of this Court’s order, the prior application/motion papers and an updated affidavit of regularity/merit from the plaintiff/lender/bank’s representative that he/she has reviewed the file in this case and that he/she documents that all paperwork is correct. The plaintiff/lender/bank’s representative shall also provide in said affidavit of regularity her/his position, length of service, training, educational background and a listing of the documents and financial records reviewed substantiating the review of the amounts owed. The affidavit should also include that she/he has personally reviewed both the mortgage and the note and any assignments for accuracy.

The plaintiff bears the burden of proof in a summary judgment proceeding and judgment will only be awarded when all doubt is removed as to the existence of any triable issue of fact. Under the present circumstances, where there have been numerous instances alleged as to “robo” signing of documents and a failure to attest to the accuracy of documents in mortgage foreclosure proceedings, the plaintiff must prove its entitlement to foreclose on a mortgage as a matter of law by establishing the regularity and accuracy of the financial documentary evidence submitted and the Court will be scrutinizing all documents for accuracy.

The foregoing constitutes the decision of the Court.

SEE ALL 127  Below…

Florida Judges take note…

~

4closureFraud.org

~

Comments
5 Responses to “NY JUDGE DENIES 127 FORECLOSURES PURSUANT TO ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER FROM CHIEF JUDGE, ROBO SIGNING”
  1. James M says:

    I don’t think these are final orders on the case. It just means the SJ is denied and the plaintiffs can go back, get the papers in order and try again next month. The court is saying, don’t give me grounds to deny the bank, bring the right papers to court so that I don’t get overturned too often.

    Dear Banks, I am going to rule in your favor, just don’t make me look bad.

  2. Liberty and Justice for ALL~ says:

    My case was dismissed on 10/25/2010 in Lee County Florida. The Judge still has yet signed the Final Order or the Final Disposition…because of a case that came to his attention on 11/10/10. So a case form nearly 3 weeks after mine was dismissed comes to his attention, and he is not signing the Final Order or the Final Disposition. Due to this, I have to continue going to Docket Soundings every 7 weeks and wasting both my time, but also $60 and hour for a Court Reporter.

    Wish some of those NY Judges would come to Lee County Florida and educate some of the Judges here about servicing the public and up holding the laws!

    • pparke500 says:

      My motion to dismiss was cancelled in Lee County because the Court Director told me there weren’t enough cases sched. for this past Tuesday to make it worthwhile for the Judge to come to court. I personally think it is because I am a pro se litigant, it was a motion to dismiss, and he doesn’t plan on granting it anyway. But, I am planning to take a court reporter with me when I finally do get a hearing.

      • Liberty and Justice for ALL~ says:

        Use Ft Myers Court Reporting. They are very dependable and professional 239-334-4141

Leave a Reply