Appeals Court Ruling May Nullify Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB) Rulemakings

cfpb

Appeals Court Ruling May Nullify Consumer Finance Protection Bureau Rulemakings

A ruling by the Washington, DC federal appeals court in Noel Canning v. NLRB pretty much ends the ability of presidents to make recess appointments, a measure that has been used since 1867. The suit successfully challenged a NLRB rulemaking on the grounds that three of the five directors were recess appointments which meant the NLRB lacked a quorum to give it authority to act. Georgetown law professor Adam Levitin believes this decision will stick:

The DC Circuit’s held on two separate grounds that the NLRB members were not validly appointed. All of the NLRB members in question were appointed as so-called “recess” appointments by the President, meaning that they were appointed without the advice and consent of the Senate. First, the DC Circuit held that these appointments were invalid because they were appointed under the Recess Appointments power at a time when the Senate was not in recess. And second, the DC Circuit held that the appointments were invalid because the Recess Appointments power only applies to vacancies that arise during a recess, not vacancies that are continuing during a recess, and the vacancies in question arose before the (non-)recess. The ruling is based on the DC Circuit’s close textual reading of the Recess Appointments clause of the Constitution (in particular, the use of the term “the Recess” instead of “a Recess”), but is also butressed by policy arguments.

While I don’t like the result of the decision, it doesn’t read as a strained or flagrantly political decision (unlike Business Roundtable v. SEC, say), even if the panel was all GOP appointees. I assume the decision will get appealed and would think there’s a reasonable chance that certiorari will be granted by the Supreme Court, but there’s a real chance that the decision will stand either because certiorari won’t be granted or because the Supreme Court will affirm.

This decision throws a huge monkey wrench in the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau. The agency was created by combining various existing consumer finance regulatory authority in one place. Actions related to those powers should be unaffected by this decision. However, the CFPB acquired additional powers under Dodd Frank that became effective only when the agency’s director was in place. Richard Cordray, the agency’s first and current director, was a recess appointment. Per the logic of the ruling, any acts that depended on the additional powers that the agency obtained when a director was installed are nullified

More here…

~

4closureFraud.org

Comments
2 Responses to “Appeals Court Ruling May Nullify Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB) Rulemakings”
  1. bobbi swann says:

    Oh, not to worry. The Supreme Court will rule for certiorari and this will get swept under the rug. Heck, they won’t even rule on all those lawsuits filed that Obama’s presidency should be nullified. Obama thinks he does not need the Senate or otherwise to make decisions. He does as he pleases all in the name of taking us further to the NWO.

  2. c.l.p.a.g. Chris says:

    Merely a minor Speed Bump in the race to Talmudic Communist N.W.O;
    by those demon tribes, self deeming their selves as the alleged “Chosen” by some pagan demon god?

Leave a Reply