When the Government Backs Mortgages

White House

When the government backs mortgages

Federal backing inoculates us against the perils of boom and bust.

How should we reform our broken housing finance system? To what extent should the federal government continue to provide guarantees for mortgage financing, such as the ones it provides for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? With Fannie and Freddie in a federal conservator ship that has already cost taxpayers more than $140 billion, it’s politically popular to suggest that the answer is “not much.”

But policymakers should be wary of that consensus. Historically, government-backed mortgages are closely linked with stability in housing finance, an inoculation against the otherwise chronic cycle of boom and bust.

Federal guarantees have been a part of the U.S. housing finance system since the New Deal. Before then, mortgage markets were extremely unstable, experiencing a financial crisis every decade or so. This constant volatility was a major barrier to economic growth and the development of U.S. capital markets.

The problems in pre-New Deal private housing finance culminated in the banking crises of the early 1930s, in which roughly half of all banks failed, triggering the Depression. Policymakers at the time responded by broadly introducing federal guarantees into mortgage finance, administered through newly created institutions and programs including the Federal Housing Administration and federal deposit insurance. Several decades later, federal guarantees were introduced for the mortgage-backed securities issued by the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Rest here…

~

4closureFraud.org

Comments
One Response to “When the Government Backs Mortgages”
  1. Sarah says:

    Overly simplistic revisionism. “Federal” backing has innoculated Wall Street, not Americans. It would seem that the most important role the press has is to constantly suggest a separation between two imaginary entities “the Government” and “the private sector”. This is absurd, and the stupidest idea suggested this fine Monday morning is that the “public” was protected by these implicit guarantees. Fanny/Freddie and the Banksters “tag teamed the public”, in a epically fraudulent conspiracy of deregulated predation, What passes for Justice in the USA has gone clearly out of their way to protect those responsible. This article and many like it are an indifferent insult to people who have lost their homes, their life savings and their jobs while the economy tumbled into the abyss.

Leave a Reply