Posted by Karl Denninger in Corruption

In a pair of articles that outline exactly how outrageously corrupt our government’s so-called “regulators” really are, The WSJ points to the Senate investigation on Washington Mutual:

WASHINGTON–Officials at the failed banking operations of Washington Mutual Inc. securitized substantial volumes of risky, fraudulent loans in the run-up to the financial meltdown despite repeated internal warning signs, according to a Senate probe.

Got that?  Not just dangerous loans, fraudulent loans.

The subcommittee has obtained documents showing that “at a critical point Washington Mutual included loans in its securities because they were likely to suffer a high rate of default, and they failed to disclose that to the buyers,” Sen. Levin said. “They also allowed loans that had been identified as fraudulent to be sold to buyers, again without alerting buyers when the fraud was discovered.”

Got that again?  The bank intentionally included defective loans in securities it sold to investors.

What started my publication of The Market Ticker was my own investigation of Washington Mutual and other lenders after the Asian “blip” in 2007.  On April 18th, 2007 I wrote the following:

This is the same sort of crap that sunk Lucent and Enron – booking “income” that is not in fact spendable, as it has an impairment associated with it (the LTV is INCREASED by this negative amortization) AND it is not CASH!

There is a legitimate argument to be made for booking this as a net increase in the bank’s assets, offset with a loss reserve due to the increase in LTV on the property (this is the most likely part of the principle to be unrecoverable in the event of a default.) In effect this is a capital asset that is drawn down in value over some period of time – up to 30 years for most mortgages.

But now the bank has elected to pay 55 cents of dividend, yet the single largest contributor to their “86 cents of net income” this last quarter was in fact capitalized interest that cannot be spent!

Washington Mutual made these loans because the negative amortization allowed them to book “earnings” that did not and never would actually occur.

That was the essence of what was going on and it was why they didn’t give a damn whether the loans performed or not – until they blew (and even beyond, if they didn’t foreclose!) they were booking “earnings” that in fact were bogus.

It was and is all about legalized scams that our government has repeatedly refused to put a stop to.  In the 1990s we had hundreds of companies releasing “pro forma” earnings that bore no reasonable relationship to actual operating results, using EBIDTA for their numbers when “B, I, D, T and A” were, added together, double their reported “earnings” and in fact the firm was burning cash like a Weimar Republic family trying to keep warm.  This of course was destined to and did detonate in a chain-reaction set of failures from 2000-2003 that we called “The Tech Crash.”

Supposedly Sarbanes-Oxley put a stop to this crap after ENRON, which was the mother and father of all hinky accounting deals.  Well, unless you also count Winstar, Lucent and MCI, all three of which were doing similar “creative” things with their books.  The first and last were deferring the recognition of build-out costs for their networks through what amounted to Option ARM loans on the hardware they needed!  When they couldn’t pay and blew up Lucent was nearly bankrupted as a consequence (particularly by their relationship with Winstar.)

How bad was the fraud problem?  The WSJ says:

Some of the worst problems occurred in high-volume loan offices in the California cities of Montebello and Downey. A year-long internal investigation found fraud rates of 58% and 83% in those offices. The results were reported to the bank’s head of home loans.

Not only was nothing done then by the bank, but nothing was done by the regulators.  The government did and still does willfully and intentionally look the other way, and not one indictment has issued among any of these banksters.

Let’s remember folks that without the “free credit” games the housing bubble would have never inflated.  Without the “free money” hairdressers couldn’t buy $500,000 houses.  But The Obama Administration is hellbent and determined to continue the “free money” meme with bailouts and handouts to everyone to buy cars, houses, and sate the Obama’s gonna pay my mortgage! crowd.

Geithner is crowing about the government’s “success” once again:

America is close to turning the page on this economic crisis. While far too many Americans are still out of work and face deep economic hardship, we have now reported three quarters of positive growth and the beginnings of job creation.


In fact, I’ll go further: You rat bastard.

Why?  Because Geithner acknowledges what happened:

The true cost of this crisis, however, will always be measured by the millions of lost jobs, the trillions in lost savings and the thousands of failed businesses. No future generation should have to pay such a price.

These lost jobs, lost savings and thousands of failed businesses were not an accident, they were not “unforeseeable” and they were not “unavoidable” or “part of a business cycle.”

Read the above again: Six to eight out of ten loans made out of that WaMu office were fraudulent.

Fraud is supposed to result in criminal charges and prison time.

Yet no indictments have issued, none of these banksters have gone to prison, and not only have the people responsible not been prosecuted they’ve gotten rich off their scams and kept the damn money that they stole!

That is welcome news. The best way to protect American families who take out a mortgage or a car loan or who save to put their kids through college is through an independent, accountable agency that can set and enforce clear rules of the road across the financial marketplace.

The best way to protect American families is to prosecute fraudulent conduct and put the scammers in prison where they belong. These people don’t care about fines, just as Pfizer didn’t – they pled guilty to the same felony twice, treating it as “a cost of doing business” as it was about one percent of their market cap.

The only deterrent available is to start throwing the scammers in prison.  All of them.  We can start with the people at WaMu and Lehman, then go down the list and for each and every firm that cooked its balance sheet, nailing them under SarBox as well.  While we’re at it jail every bank executive involved in crooked derivatives deals with municipal and state governments, starting with Jefferson County in Alabama.

Transparency will lower costs for users of derivatives, such as industrial or agriculture companies, allowing them to more effectively manage their risk. It will enable regulators to more effectively monitor risks of all significant derivatives players and financial institutions, and prevent fraud, manipulation and abuse. And by bringing standardized derivatives into central clearing houses and trading facilities, the Senate bill would reduce the risk that the derivatives market will again threaten the entire financial system.

You’re a liar Geithner.

Continue reading here…