DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
July Term 2010
LAW OFFICES OF DAVID J. STERN, P.A. and DAVID J. STERN,
individually,
Appellants,
v.
LOREN BANNER and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Appellees.
CASE No. 4D09-3928
[ December 29, 2010 ]

First some background on this case…

LINK – MORTGAGE-REINSTATEMENT SUIT GROWS

From the appeal…

The standard of review of an order granting a motion for class certification is abuse of discretion. InPhyNet Contracting Servs., Inc. v. Soria, 33 So. 3d 766, 770 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (quoting Olen Props. Corp. v. Moss, 981 So. 2d 515, 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)); Chase Manhattan Mortg. Corp. v. Porcher, 898 So. 2d 153, 156 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (citing Stone v. Compuserve Interactive Servs., Inc., 804 So. 2d 383, 387 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)); Turner Greenberg Assocs., Inc. v. Pathman, 885 So. 2d 1004, 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Using that standard, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s decision to certify the class in this case and
affirm the certification order.

Affirmed.

This case is actually bigger than it appears on the surface because it also pertains to the ongoing investigations into the mills and their motions to quash…

Things might get interesting…

Full opinion below…

~

4closureFraud.org

~

Law Offices of David j. Stern, p.a. and David j. Stern, Individually, V. Loren Banner and Wells Fargo Bank, n.a.