Appeals Court Reinstates ‘Fair Debt’ Suit Accusing Foreclosure Mill Of Attempted Fee Gouging In Mortgage Payoff Letters Sent To Homeowner’s Attorney

A Federal Court of Appeals just reinstated a lawsuit filed by a New Jersey homeowner seeking class action status that accuses the law firm representing a foreclosing lender of sending the homeowner’s attorney mortgage payoff letters that included charges that, according to the lawsuit, were unauthorized by the loan agreement and were otherwise not allowed by law.

In reinstating the lawsuit, the appeals court referred to a ruling it issued last month in which it addressed this same question of law. In Allen v. LaSalle Bank, N.A., ___ F.3d ____, No. 09-1466, 2011 WL 94420 (3d Cir. Jan 12, 2011), it decided that a communication from a debt collector to a consumer’s attorney is actionable under § 1692f(1) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). One of the defendants in the Allen case is the same foreclosure mill targeted in the current case (Fein, Such, Kahn, And Shepard, P.C.).

Full opinion below…



Michael Ogbin; Lynn Ogbin, v. Fein, Such, Kahn and Shepard, P.C.
[scribd id=49476681 key=key-jpopwykc621u3x2pzou mode=list]