Now, this is how it’s done…
For those of you that do not know the term, “It’s On Like Donkey Kong” I provide the definition below…
“A phrase to denote that it’s time to throw down or compete at a high level; something is about to go down. The use of the comical video game character Donkey Kong provides comic relief but the phrase itself has greater or more significance than simply its on.”
For more on Michael Pines see here…
Personally sent to us from one of our fighters from the trenches…
MICHAEL T. PINES, an individual;
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF CARLSBAD, PAUL
EDMONSON, CITY OF SIMI VALLEY,
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,
CALIFORNIA STATE BAR, COUNTY
OF SAN DIEGO
Defendants
Now pay attention to the text from the complaint…
Read it, understand it, and share it with everyone…
This post is longer than the norm but for good reason…
~
We will start with the OVERVIEW…
OVERVIEW
The financial institutions and their co-conspirator loan servicers, real estate investors, real estate brokers, and attorneys (Collectively “Banks”) have turned law enforcement into criminals. Law enforcement knowingly engages in a common practice of violating the law. People are being wrongfully evicted from their homes in the millions. Instead or protecting citizens from this criminal conduct, law enforcement aids and abets it and even arrests the victims instead of the criminals.
Plaintiff is a public figure and reputed to be one of the original experts in foreclosure and related law and one of four attorneys that originated legal and public movements against the “Banks”.
He has been arrested on numerous occasions for perfectly legal activities and never prosecuted.
Plaintiff was also the subject of proceedings by the State Bar which is corrupt and conspired with the Banks.
Now let’s take a look at the FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS…
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
The core of this action arises out of the biggest criminal fraud in history – predatory lending, the unlawful securitization of real proerty loans, and criminal fraud in real estate loan servicing and collection.
Predatory Lending
It is of such common knowledge that the Court can take judicial notice of the fact that the entire nation was victimized by Pedatory Lending.
The specific facts are set forth in, “The Monster, How A Gang of Pedatory Lenders And Wall Street Bankers Fleeced America – And Spawned A Global Crisis, Michael W. Hudson, Times Books, Henry Holt and Co. LLC., 2010 (“Monster”).
Monster is complete with legal citations, annotations, and irrefutable legal proof.
Securitization
Real property loans throughout the United States were securitized in the “RMBS” market (Residential Mortgage Backed Securites) and the “CMBS” market (Commercial Mortage Backed Securites),
As is typical when a loan is securitized, the funds Property Owners borrowed did not come from any source that Property Owners could readily identify. Instead, the money came from “Investors,” the identity of whom was concealed by those involved in originating the loan (“Originators”). Notably, Investors all over the world who actually loaned Property Owners money in the first place have filed countless of their own legal actions based at least in part on the very same allegations of predatory lending Property Owners were subjected to. Some examples are: New Orleans Employees’ Retirement System et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, et al., United States District Court, Western District of Washington at Seattle, Case No: 2:09-cv-00134-MJPE. Even quasi-federal agencies that invested are filing actions. See, e.g., Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Credit Suisse, CGC-10-497840 and Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v Deutsche Bank, CGC-10-497839, San Francisco Superior Court (collectively all of the above investor actions are the “Investor Cases”). The Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, reputed to be the largest and most powerful banking institution in the world has publicly it’s intention to file similar suit against Bank of America. The U.S. Government has also filed suit.
Even before the loans were made, the “Securitizers” had planned and arranged to securitize the loans. In the course of securitizing the loans, Securitizers had a practice of taking more money from the Investors than was loaned to the Property Owners and the Investors. In addition, there were usually “credit enhancements” which could take several forms including such things as “excess spreads”, over collateralization, reserve accounts, surety bonds, wrapped securities, letters of credit, and cash collateral accounts. (See, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_enhancement for a more detailed description). The well-known problems with American International Group (AIG) relate to credit enhancements. Both the Property Owners and the Investors have claims to the credit enhancement funds as well as undisclosed fees taken by the Originators and Securitizers and possible credits and offsets for other items.
As to Property Owners, such funds should be credited against their loans. But it is even worse. For example, according to Property Owners’ records they overpaid at least tens of thousands of dollars were not actually owed. Property Owners allege that once a proper accounting is done and proper credits applied, it will be shown that Property Owners will owe nothing on their loans making the unlawful detainer action used to evict them simply a part of the ongoing fraud. The Defendants had actual knowledge of this, yet, Defendants decided to aid and abet in the fraud.
Securitization Of Mortgage Loans Including Property Owners
Securitization is intentionally complex and the details and even some of the mathematical calculations involved cannot be succinctly set forth in a complaint.
As set forth in the Investor Cases, the securities that the “Securitizers” (anyone involved in securitization) sold are so-called asset-backed securities, or “ABS,” created in a process known as securitization. More specifically, they involved a complex financial instrument product known generically in the securities industry as collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”). “Synthetic” CDOs are even more complex instruments that are “derivatives” based only indirectly on the CDOs (i.e., Credit Default Swaps).
Securitization begins with the sale of bonds to Investors (usually they are sold “forward”) meaning they are sold to the investors before the Investors’ funds are given to mortgage borrowers such as the Property Owners. Only some of the funds were then used to fund loans such as Property Owners. Investors were led to believe all of their funds except for reasonable fees were forwarded, but this was false.
The entities involved in making the loans are known as the Originators. The process by which the Originators decide whether or not to make particular loans is known as the underwriting of loans. During the loan underwriting process, representations were made to the Investors that the originators would apply various criteria to try to ensure that the loan will be repaid. However, they did not do so and instead, the way the securitization scheme was structured, it was actually in the best interests of the “Securitizers” (including Originators) for the loans to fail. They were clearly not acting with the interests of Property Owners or the Investors in mind.
Until the loans are securitized, the borrowers on the loans sometimes make their loan payments to an Originator, but this may never occur or only be for a very short time. Collectively, the payments on the loans are known as the cash flow from the loans.
A large number of loans, often of a similar type, were supposed to be grouped into a collateral pool. The Originator of those loans claims it sells them (and, with them, the right to receive the cash flow) to a special purpose vehicle called a trust by the Securitizers. The trust is supposed to pay the Originator cash for the loans. As mentioned, the trust raises the cash to pay for the loans by selling bonds, in the form of certificates, to Investors. Each certificate purportedly entitles its holder to an agreed part of the cash flow from the loans in the collateral pool.
There are tranches of investment bonds sold. Typically, “Tranche A” is a veneer of conventional mortgages where the borrowers appear creditworthy. Other tranches had much less credit worthy borrowers. Using the creditworthy borrowers, the Securitizers obtained ratings on the bonds that were inaccurate at best. Securitizers conspired with the rating agencies to mislead investors. Thus, schematically, these are some of the steps in a securitization in no specific order:
a. Investments are created for Investors usually in the form of Bonds.
b. Credit Enhancements are obtained.
c. Rating agencies are provided misleading information and paid to rate the Bonds as “safe”.
d. Investors pay money to the trust.
e. The trust issues certificates to the Investors.
f. The trust pays money to the parties up the chain toward the borrower/property owner through the Originators.
g. Only part of the funds are used to fund mortgage loans such as the one made to Property Owners.
h. The rest of the money is kept by the Originators and Securitizers in the scheme. In other words, by way of example, the Investors might think they are funding a loan for $1 million, however, only $500,000 is actually loaned to borrowers such as the Property Owners, and the Securitizers keep the rest through a complex series of transactions.
i. The Originator and Securitizers plan in advance for the loans to default.
j. Loans made to persons like Property Owners are purportedly placed into one or more pools.
k. The Originator was supposed to assign to the trust the loans and in particular the promissory notes, which were to be placed into a collateral pool, including the right to receive the cash, but a proper assignment/transfer was never done.
l. The trust is supposed to collect cash flow from payments on the loans in the collateral pool; however it has no legal right to do so even under the lengthy, complex documents used in securitization.
m. When the mortgage loans go into default, the Securitizers demand that payment be made to the Investors by the “credit enhancements.”
n. In “Credit Default Swaps” the Securitizers also placed “bets” that the loans would not pay off (as was planned) in order to cover the difference between what was loaned to borrowers such as Plaintiff and what was funded by the Investors and make another hidden profit for the Securitizers. According to some published reports, these unregistered securities were frequently more than 30 times the principal on the mortgage loans (such as Property Owners’). Thus, if the borrowers such as Property Owners did not perform on the loans, the Securitizers would make more money than if they did.
o. After default, even though the mortgage loan is technically paid in full if a proper accounting were done, and legally the Securitizers have no right to collect, the Securitizers, usually through “servicers”, pretend the loan is still owed by the borrowers. They pretend and represent to persons such as Property Owners money is owed on the loans to the original named “beneficiary” on the deed of trust, and try to foreclose on the mortgage and steal the mortgaged real property from borrowers such as the Property Owners. The Mortgage Electronic Registration System (“MERS”) was often used as a part of the scheme named as the “nominal beneficiary” to pretend it had the right to transfer the mortgages and/or collect money from the borrowers such as Property Owners.
p. Securitizers hire law firms such as Defendants who know or should know collection of loans such as the Subject Loan is improper and routinely conceal information concerning such to the courts. (In Re Nosek)
q. The U.S. Supreme Court has found that these law firms are liable in class actions under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. (Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LP, et al., 130 S. Ct. 1605; decided April 21, 2010). 27. At the risk of being redundant, but also more specific and adding that the taxpayers are paying for this, the order of things is usually as follows:
• The first transactions that occurred were the sale of securities to unsuspecting investors.
• The second transaction that occurred was that the investor money was put into an account at an investment banking firm.
• The third transaction was that the investment banker divided the money between fees for itself and then distributing the funds to aggregators or a Depository Institution.
• The fourth transaction was the closing with the borrower. The loan was funded with the money from the investor after deducting large undisclosed fees and also because of the disparity between the interest payable to the investor and the interest payable by the borrower, a yield spread was created, adding huge sums to what the investment banker took without disclosure to the investors or the borrowers.
• The fifth was the assignment and acceptance of the loan generally into between 1 and 3 asset pools, each bearing distinctive language describing the pool such that they appeared to be different assets than already presumed to exist in the first pool.
• The sixth was the receipt of insurance or counter-party payments on behalf of the pool pursuant to the documents creating the securitization structure.
• The seventh was the re-securitization of the pooled assets between one and three times.
• The eighth was the federal bailout payments and receipts allocable to the balances owed on the loans that were claimed to be part of the pool.
• The ninth are the foreclosures by parties who never provided any money which is often the original named beneficiary on the trust deed.
• In the alternative fraudulent and forged assignments were made, so it could be alleged the law firm defendants represent investors (“robo-signing”) occurred which is currently the subject of criminal investigations.
• Lastly, attorneys are hired to evict the Home owners such as Property Owners.
• After eviction, the house is sold to a new Home owner who is also defrauded since they are told none of this, and no one knows at this point where the proceeds from the sales go.
• It is unlikely it goes back to the government which has at least indirectly funded all this through “bail outs”.
I need to stop here…
If you are still with me on this one, you can check out the full complaint with the criminal loan collections and causes of action in the PDF file below…
~
4closureFraud.org
~
Fraud is fraud. It’s illegal and immoral! The fraud was upon homeowners before they made the first payment. Im amazed at how intelligent people think portray themselves to be. Anyone who believes that a person behind in their bills are scum have limited capacity in thought. Basically if someone robs you of all your money and you can’t pay the rent then you are scum. Not the person who committed the crime but YOU! Crime is not immoral.. being a victim IS!
If I had to guess who that genius MORON with the brilliant opinion was I would say Jamie Dimon.
There are plenty of wins in court. Just don’t expect to see them published. An attorney or a pro se just has to argue solid legal fact. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS are absurd on their face. pleading HONEST LIES or TRUTHFUL ACCUSATIONS will not cut it and the judges will twist it around. Stick to basics. LAW is LAW and no judge can ignore LEGAL FACTS. Point out any laws that conflict. The hands of the party attempting to hold another to the terms of a contract they breached first has unclean hands.
The more people banks steal from the less customers they will have. A bank with no customers is worthless.
Yup im learning this!!!! Like ihaveal!
u so smart!!!! Is blackstone part of these crooks now selling a lot of stuff?
spewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwaway!!!!
Hey scumbags who don’t pay your bills. Ever think of doing some RESEARCH and speaking to ex-clients of Pines? Maybe then you’ll grow a brain cell or two. Plenty of Professional Negligence lawsuits against Pines coming one filed by a Police Commissioner. Hummmm, do I smell an investigation deep into Pines’ crimes?
If you brainless morons spoke to one client Pines ripped off, (try the Police Commissoiner for starters, or the 20 families in San Francisco) when they were down to their last few dollars, you’d show some sympathy to the real victims in Pines’ game. But, keep acting ignorant, and you’ll be homeless too.
You’ll NEVER WIN a suit based on fraud documents. Just like Pines has never won a case. Not one. They have all been thrown out and dismissed. Why won’t you win either? YOU lied on your application. You moron. YOU didn’t read your loan documents. You moron. YOU SIGNED AND AGREED to a payment. You moron. Then, YOU used your house like an ATM, mortgaged it to the hilt, got busted and got foreclosed on. You moron.
So, get the hell out, you moron, downsize to something you can AFFORD, you moron, and stop crying about fraud documents and banksters when YOU MORONS are the real thieves and scumbags, who spent your equity. Get it low life’s? OF COURSE YOU DON’T you are snowed by the likes of Pines into believing you are getting a free house, you morons. You are too stupid to realize that is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN, you morons.. You are a pathetic bunch though, I’ll give you that.
Keep commiserating while Pines gets richer and you get poorer. you morons.. Brain dead , corrupt morons like you caused the financial crisis. Lying on documents and not paying your note, you morons. YOU ARE SCUM, and morons.
whew!
Hey web master how come you did not get this dirt bag`s IP address yet ? we cannot just have this he /she or it spew at us without paying the premium can we?
well dats why i called the law i dint want ip i wanted on record i do not watch porn! why didnt you get it since u know it all!!!
Hey , Cockroach, I already won in Federal District Court for the “Fraudulent Appraisal”. so you are wrong., it involved the “Fraudulent Documents”. DUH ! I suggest you do some research and read “Brown vs. Quicken Loans” Wheeling, West Virginia. The “Award” nearly totaled three (3) million, and yea MORON, she won the house “FREE and CLEAR”. So do yourself a “Favor” stay hidden like the “Cockroach” you are…. When the lights come on, you’ll be running for your life. Perfect name for you. New Jersey Courts will give the Plaintiff’s two (2) chances to “PRODUCE the NOTE”, and then they get “Dismissed with Prejudice”. So-o-o- goodnite Cockroach.
Sounds like something a CEO from BOA or JPC might say…. Get lost a$$hole! Nobody wants to read your piece of Sh$t comments that mean NOTHING to anyone but you. I PAY MY BILLS AND HAVE A FICO OF 749, how’s that MORON! SOB!!!
Hey Keep Ridung…..that is part of your name…..keep riding and get the hell off here…..you use words that sound very elementary……in fact, this is none of your business what we pay and who we pay. So bag off…….
gots anutter dream to tell u
Since you think I know it all, does not say so much about you, right?
i know nuttin!
but i get it mario lol
Securitization is a Hoax.
“[T]ypes of notes that are not securities include the note delivered in consumer financing, the note secured by a mortgage on a home, the short-term note secured by a lien on … assets, the note evidencing a `character’ loan to a bank customer, short-term notes secured by an assignment of accounts receivable, or a note which simply formalizes an open-account debt incurred”. Reves v. Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56, 65, 110 S.Ct. 945, 108 L.Ed.2d 47 (1990)(internal quotations omitted)
Proper litigation between all real parties in interest is impossible for people living in 49 different States. Litigation for homeowners must take place where the property is located. Cases between Investors and anybody else are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of New York (trust law) making it a jurisdictional impossibility. The PSAs are VOID on their face as to homeowners because of this conflict and are not subject to any defenses or waivers in law or equity. If Pension investors and whoever (even Goldman Sachs) purport to be holders in due course after an alleged ‘securitization’, all the evidence in the world could not help them enforce their rights, foreclose or collect any money from homeowners living in 49 different states because jurisdiction in those states is not obtainable AS THEY ARE NOT NEW YORK (the exclusive jurisdiction).
This is another reason why none of the ownership to or possession of Notes were ever transfered over to the Trusts. This is also why a settlement between homeowners and investors can NEVER be reached.
Let me tell you all my big secret, just for the record, last Feb 22 2011, I won my house, so that silly NO NAME poster who comes here spewing off ITS face should know that I do not have a mortgage, I beat their behind in court, a court of law , they did not come back yet, and if they do I will whip them again.
Next round I am going for big money, more money than the house is worth, or will ever be worth, so suck it up NO NAME name and know that a huge bankster did not want to fight me, as a matter of actual fact the Plaintiff complemented me as I left the court.
Just know there are certain people banksters do not mess with, how they took down this lawyer beats me. I guess its the luck of the draw, right?.
I know NO NAME has dirt to hide.
I do pay my bills but I choose which ones are worth paying, the ones that truly deserves my hard work and red blood.
I am happy that people are beginning to understand that the banks are all foreign banks, which includes BOA, yes BOA is a foreign corp too.
Millions and millions of Americans have already paid for the BIGGEST PONZI SCHEME HEIST AND SWINDLE IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD with their jobs, businesses, lives and homes. The ONGOING EXTRACTION BY THESE SAME FOREIGN FINANCIAL TERRORISTS OF THE WEALTH, HOMES AND JOBS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO FEED THE GREED AND FEED THE RICH MUST STOP, IT IS BANKRUPTING AMERICA. MAKE WALL STREET PAY FOR THE PONZI SCHEME,THE U.S. GOVERNMENT MUST STOP ALLOWING THE ONGOING CLASS WARFARE AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO FEED THE RICH, IT IS MAKING AMERICA AN IMPOVERISHED LAND, RIPE FOR FOREIGN TAKEOVER!!!!!!!!
BLOOMBERG REPORTED THE OTHER DAY, IF THERE IS NO NFL FOOTBALLL THIS SEASON, BLAME THE MORTGAGE FRAUD. THE NFL WAS HEAVILY INVESTED IN THE MORTGAGE FRAUD. WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!!
WELL I SEE VERY AMERICAN PEOPLE HELPING THE FOREIGNERS ALL THE SCOURGE I KNOW ARE FROM HERE!
How about when the Law Firm that represents the Banksters in about 90% of the foreclosures in your state are also Defendants in several Civil Cases in the Federal Courts??? Shouldn’t that prevent them from continuing to litigate any case having to do with foreclosures and fraud accusations????
I will let you know how this one turns out because the same Firm has just started the foreclosure process on my property for the fourth time since 2006. I am ready for a pre-emptive strike this time and will put them in the position of being the Defendants instead of the Plaintiff’s.
As to the Complaint at the heart of this discussion…. I have been pro se since 2007 and even with my limited experience it is easy to see that the structure of that complaint is pathetic and it will probably be dismissed before the ink from the clerks stamp is dry.
However, as I have done in the past and continue to do in my life of legal self-education I will take from it all the information that is benefical to the cause and use it in my own way. You never know from what source you might find something useful.
Strength to all and good luck.
DL
55 and holding
YOU TRYING TO SEDUCE ANY LADIES:) 60 AND HOLDING………………
I GET IT YOU TRYING TO BE MY HERO!!!! AT THIS POINT THS POSITION IS OPEN!!! PAY IS LOW! REWARDS HUGE AND TREMENDOUS!
I agree with Mario. The spirit is great, and for once, the process is set out in front of a California court (yes!), but the emotional content is too great, and the points of law will not convince a CA judge. What we need are a combination of this and some serious brief writing based on current cases.
I like his spirit very much but the complaint was not so well written, I wished he had asked me to write it for him, or to help, most attys or some cannot do everything and they need support and help, thats why we have para legals. I think we need to help them to take more houses in CA first, then start fighting them.
The people need to suffer to the point where they actually begin to see it and do something on their own. When they empty out whole cities and the value of the homes go to rock bottom, worth nothing, then yuh talking.
Ever noticed how when a boat is empty it makes more noise, than a full boat?
Right on Marto……A few words can say a whole ‘ lot of truth ‘…..
EXACTLY! The “insurance” paid the claims, technically making the lender whole. Its fraudulent to try to collect on the same claim twice! (through foreclosure and resale). #201 is gonna stick! Nice work Michael.
Thank you for the continued hard work.
🙂
He can’t win a case. He’s never won a case. He needs to have his head examined. All his clients lost. He lost all his own cases. Pines has 7 properties in foreclosure. Pines filed BK on 01/14/11 and he lost his State Bar Court case representing himself. He’s 0-200, try as he might. Incompetency will get you attention, but you won’t win. Crawl back to Utah, Pines. Calif doesn’t need a scam artist like you with NO FOUNDATION for your rediculous suit.
Incompetency is a prerequisite for being a vampire attorney , its the arrogance of being 1 of the undead.
So did the vampires reject you? heh .. must be the shitty tasting snack u b.
Gee, this sounds really familiar. Aren’t you in CA doing the same thing he is doing? I would bet so……JB!!
hahahahahaha…JB… you put the guy out to pasture…well done!
I dont see you posting the crudentials needed to stand behind your claims Mr. MICHAEL T. PINES’ law License is SUSPENDED. Are you a CEO for Bank of America or JP Chase? Hmmmm, caught you didn’t I?
Yes, Follow his LEAD and file the SAME COMPLAINT/LAWSUIT in your state. This is the only way we can WIN. One cannot believe, that this government is going to automatically RESCIND our Mortgages. Stand up and be counted. It is not that hard to file pro-se. Just do it? As a pro-se litigant, they will transfer the filing from Superior Court to the Federal Court on Motion. Fight! We can file the same, as we all have the MERS with this ORIGINATION FRAUD. We did NOT receive any DISCLOSURES. I will quit when I am six feet under.
You got it Susan! You can’t win if you refuse to be heard and it is our constitutional right! We need to educate EVERYONE!!!
WOW!! BLOOMBERG NEWS is really calling the bastards out today, so is CNBC. KUDO’S to them. It is about time they all got real. BLOOMBERG is calling out the enitre BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY whitewash cover up for Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger’s criminal actitvities. Max Keiser is calling out some bastards, too. . Check out the latest Keiser report from today at http://maxkeiser.com/
Everyone should read and comment on the guest post at max keiser.com written by Mike Kreiger entitled: The Big Lie. It is spot on and very honest, just like this post is and this website It is also a very informative website. It is up to all of us who know the truth to Keep on Sharing the knowledge and Keep on Fighting. It is up to all of us and it is way past the time for Rule by Secrecy to die the horrible death that it truly deserves.
I know they will rather have him as a member of the bar than to have him do this, this is the kind of lawyer we need in this country at this time .
so I cannot download and print the thing? why is this can someone tell me?
Lets see what the bastards will do now, if I were this lawyer I would wear a bullet proof vest get some body guards, and hide somewhere because they will kill you Dear Lawyer, you can count on this, for sure
A bulletproof vest does not help the head….and that is usually what they are after….but let’s not even think of those ‘ things ‘…. cause it could be reality…. well….the street goes two ways…..
But I give this lawyer credit…regardless of the outcome….he is 100% right….another thing…so many people are lost in the shuffle of foreclosures…they need to read what he say’s over and over to get ‘ how it happened ‘….that alone will help alot of people with their cases. .. the internet is great but the information comes in ‘ pieces ‘ and some just can’t finish the puzzle. What he say’s should guide them to at least know from the closing or before the closing…just where the frauds all starts….and get a good attorney……. CA– USE IT’S HELL IN THEM COURTS…ESPECIALLY IN FLORIDA. …
He’s so publicized now, if something happens to him it will surely be a result of retaliation and all sh$t will hit the fan!
Good Luck Mr. Pines !
Yay! That is funny. Well, not really. How long before we start seeing some accusations fly between banks and their own internal employees? It’s coming and I couldn’t be happier about it. Keep it going folks, this is exactly what we need to shut it down for good!
Uphold the law in every aspect and fight for your constitutional rights! We are Americans, no matter how corrupt the other idiots are!
Gooooo Michael!!! It may get thrown out, but we all know that he is RIGHT in what he is saying. NONE OF THE REST OF YOU HAVE THE BALLS TO STAND UP TO THESE THIEVES AND TELL THE TRUTH!!
It’s not about balls. It’s about low lifes who don’t pay their mortgages. Get a life and start paying your bills.
bla bla bla..YOU can pay everyones bills to theses vampires.. your a clown & much like your usless rhetoric ,now take a walk!
OH.. WHERE DID YOU COME FROM? ARE YOU LOST OR SOMETHING? I THINK YOU ARE ON THE WRONG FORUM…..WE ALL PAY OUR BILLS WE JUST DON’T PAY THE CRIMINAL FRAUDSTERS……SO IF YOU ARE PAYING YOUR HO– USE PAYMENTS THAN YOU ARE AIDING AND ABETTING THE CRIMINAL. SHAME ON YOU …GROW A SET……THAN YOU CAN GET A LIFE.
WHO ARE YOU CALLING LOW LIFE? BLAMING THE VICTIMS FOR THEIR OWN FINANCIAL DEMISE. NAZI SYMAPATHIZER!!!! THAT IS WHAT THE NAZI’S DID AFTER THE HOLOCAUST, THEY BLAMED THE VICTIMS FOR THERE OWN MASSACRE BY CALLING THEM COWARDS. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BECA– USE A THIS WEBSITE, THERE ARE NO COWARDS. THE ONLY COWARDS WE SEE ARE THE FOREIGN FINANCIAL TERRORISTS AND PONZI SCHEMERS AND THEIR EVIL MINIONS SUCH AS YOURSELF WHO ARE STILL POSING AS AMERICANS AND INSTITUTIONS AND CONTINUING THE EXTRACTION OF THE WEALTH OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO COVER UP FOR THEIR ONGOING PONZI SCHEME HEIST. THE HEAD OF THAT SNAKE THAT IS CAUSING A WORLDWIDE FINANCIAL HOLOCAUST CALLS ITSELF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK AND Qe2 is the weapon of choice to conduct the ongoing class warfare extraction from the American people via dollar devaluation and hyper-inflation. .
Prove that a bill is due to you or whoever along with the amount of loss suffered and I’ll write you or whoever for the amount due. Otherwise you’re just mouthing off shooting blanks.
Prove that a bill is due to you or whoever along with the amount of loss suffered and I’ll write you or whoever [a check] for the amount due. Otherwise you’re just mouthing off shooting blanks.
And all of the rampant mortgage fraud was all federally funded, insured and regulated!!!!! SHAME!!!!!!!!
Check out more about the ongoing Ponzi Scheme on the latest Keiser report at: http://maxkeiser.com/
RT news.com is also spreading alot of truth, rampantly.
imisspoke in my above comment when I said the mortgage fraud was federally funded. I should have said FEDERALLY FLOATED.
YA…AND i HAVE NEW WORDS FOR THE MEANING OF FDIC….BASTARDS ….BUT THAT IS NOT THE WORDS…THEM AND CHASE…$1.9 BILLIONS TO BUY A BANK…..THE SWINDLE AND SCAM WAS RIGHT OUT IN THE OPEN….THEY SHOULD BE STONED BY THE PEOPLE AS THEY HANG FROM THE ROPES……
RIGHT ON MARILYN1!!! FOREIGN FINANCIAL TERRORISTS AND THEIR MINIONS WHO CONTINUE TO DISGUISE THEMSELVES AS AMERICAN INSTITUTIONS THAT THEY ARE NOT!!!!!
It will be interesting to see where this one goes.
we all certainly know where he’s coming from and appreciate the notion, but from a legal perspective this looks primed to be thrown in the trash at the first hearing. like i said before, pines need to decide if he’s going to be an “above ground” or “underground” foreclosure fighter before he throws the next punch.
The man is speaking a lot of truth but, as an attorney, he must know that this isn’t the venue. It will be thrown out in about 10 minutes. Hope he doesn’t get hit with a frivolous filing charge.
FAITH!
Yep, yep! ; ) <3
Hail, Hail! To Mean Ladies, Everywhere!!
TRIBAL SCREAM.
FEAR ME NOW.
LOL!