Forget all the other questions and controversy surrounding fraudclosuregate. Forget the forged or fraudulent or sloppy assignments. Forget standing and trusts and pooling and servicing agreements. Forget possession of the original note. Forget the “technical” areas of the law and court process. Let me ask you one question:
SHOULD AMERICANS HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE SECURE IN THEIR HOME FROM UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES?
Now just a few short months ago, I thought the answer to that question was, “Duh, Yes Of Course Americans Have The Right To Be Safe In Their Homes From Unreasonable Searches and Seizures”. If I was feeling really academic I might belt out a little Constitutional Law and sing out…..
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and ht no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
(THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION)
But I would be WRONG AGAIN WEIDNER! You see, Americans do not have the right to be safe and secure in their homes…AMERICANS DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE SECURE IN THEIR PERSONS, HO– USES, PAPERS AND EFFECTS….because at any moment, the banks can come and kick down your door. If they like, they can change your locks. And if you’ve got papers and valuables lying around, they may just help themselves to them.
Be sure to check out the rest here…