SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
——————————————————-
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,
Defendant.
——————————————————-
AMENDED COMPLAINT
SUMMARY
1. This action originally requested the Court to order an immediate accounting of
two trusts known as CWALT 2005-6CB and CWALT 2006-6CB. These trusts hold
residential mortgage loans for the benefit of investors such as Plaintiff. The original
Complaint was not directed at the Defendant Trustee, but information obtained after the
filing of the Complaint demonstrates that the Defendant Trustee has violated its
contractual and other obligations to Plaintiff. Accordingly, Plaintiff seeks to hold the
Defendant Trustee liable for Plaintiff’s damages in all of the following trusts ….
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
By David McLaughlin and Jody Shenn – Aug 16, 2011
Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (BK), targeted by New York for allegedly violating state law while representing mortgage-bond investors, was accused by Knights of Columbus of damaging its investment in mortgage securities.
Knights of Columbus, a charitable organization that invested in mortgage-backed securities, seeks to recover losses and demands punitive damages from the bank, according to an amended complaint filed today in New York state court in Manhattan.
Bank of New York, which serves as trustee for trusts holding loans underlying mortgage securities, mismanaged the trust assets, Knights of Columbus said in a statement today. It accused the bank in the complaint of gross negligence and recklessness and said the bank’s actions caused a “substantial” loss.
“It is apparent that the defendant knowingly failed in its obligation to receive, process, maintain, and hold all or part of the mortgage files,” Knights of Columbus, based in New Haven, Connecticut, said. As a result, it didn’t acquire mortgage-backed securities, “but instead acquired securities backed by nothing at all,” the organization said.
Check out the rest here…
Case files and amended complaint below…
~
4closureFraud.org
~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| | Sort By | Doc # | Date Received | Document | Description | Motion # | Filing User | Payment Info |
|---|
| 1 | 20 | | | AMENDED COMPLAINT | – | PETER TSAPATSARIS | – | | 2 | 19 | 2011-08-08 | | STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO TRANSFER OR STAY | 002 | PETER TSAPATSARIS | – | | 3 | 19-1 | 2011-08-08 | | PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER | 002 | PETER
TSAPATSARIS | – | | 4 | 18 | 2011-08-01 | | – | 002 | MATTHEW INGBER | – | | 5 | 17 | 2011-08-01 | | – | – | MATTHEW INGBER | – | | 6 | 16 | 2011-07-20 | | – | 002 | MATTHEW INGBER | – | | 7 | 15 | 2011-07-20 | | – | 002 | MATTHEW INGBER | – | | 8 | 15-1 | 2011-07-20 | | – | 002 | MATTHEW
INGBER | – | | 9 | 15-2 | 2011-07-20 | | – | 002 | MATTHEW
INGBER | – | | 10 | 15-3 | 2011-07-20 | | – | 002 | MATTHEW
INGBER | – | | 11 | 15-4 | 2011-07-20 | | – | 002 | MATTHEW
INGBER | – | | 12 | 15-5 | 2011-07-20 | | – | 002 | MATTHEW
INGBER | – | | 13 | 15-6 | 2011-07-20 | | – | 002 | MATTHEW
INGBER | – | | 14 | 15-7 | 2011-07-20 | | – | 002 | MATTHEW
INGBER | – | | 15 | 14 | 2011-07-20 | | – | 002 | MATTHEW INGBER | CREDIT CARD
AMOUNT: $45
07/20/2011 | | 16 | 13 | 2011-06-24 | | RE: MOTION NO. 001, DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION ENTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK ON JUNE 24, 2011 | 001 | CLIFFORD REIG | – | | 17 | 12 | 2011-06-01 | | PRO HAC VICE MOTION TALCOTT FRANKLIN | 001 | PETER TSAPATSARIS | CREDIT CARD
AMOUNT: $45
06/01/2011 | | 18 | 12-1 | 2011-06-01 | | PROPOSED ORDER TALCOTT FRANKLIN | 001 | PETER
TSAPATSARIS | CREDIT CARD
AMOUNT: $45
06/01/2011 | | 19 | 12-2 | 2011-06-01 | | PETER TSAPATSARIS | 001 | PETER
TSAPATSARIS | CREDIT CARD
AMOUNT: $45
06/01/2011 | | 20 | 12-3 | 2011-06-01 | | AFFIDAVIT TALCOTT FRANKLIN | 001 | PETER
TSAPATSARIS | CREDIT CARD
AMOUNT: $45
06/01/2011 | | 21 | 12-4 | 2011-06-01 | | PROOF OF SERVICE | 001 | PETER
TSAPATSARIS | CREDIT CARD
AMOUNT: $45
06/01/2011 | | 22 | 11 | 2011-06-01 | | PROOF OF SERVICE | – | PETER TSAPATSARIS | – | | 23 | 10 | 2011-06-01 | | COMMERCIAL DIVISION ADDENDUM | – | PETER TSAPATSARIS | – | | 24 | 9 | 2011-06-01 | | RJI | – | PETER TSAPATSARIS | CREDIT CARD
AMOUNT: $95
06/01/2011 | | 25 | 8 | | | PROOF OF SERVICE | – | PETER TSAPATSARIS | – | | 26 | 7 | | | COMMERCIAL DIVISION ADDENDUM | – | PETER TSAPATSARIS | – | | 27 | 6 | 2011-06-01 | | RJI | – | PETER TSAPATSARIS | – | | 28 | 5 | | | PROOF OF SERVICE | – | PETER TSAPATSARIS | – | | 29 | 4 | | | COMMERCIAL DIVISION ADDENDUM | – | PETER TSAPATSARIS | – | | 30 | 3 | 2011-06-01 | | RJI | – | PETER TSAPATSARIS | – | | 31 | 2 | 2011-06-01 | | AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE | – | |
|
|
~
Case File New York Supr Ct Amended Complaint in Re Knights of Columbus v Bonym
They are a cherritable organization like the Shriners. They fund raise and give money to alot of cherrities like St. Jude Childerens Hospital and cancer funds and other such organizations. My Grand Dad belonged to The Nights Of Columbus and was always doing cherritable events for them.
Bloodsoaked, I am not talking about who is doing what the do at face value….I am talking about who is at the top..Like the Cathollc Church and the Masons…I am talking about the hierarchy of the organization….
BLOODSOAKED, I MEAN WHO ARE THE OWNERS OF THE ORGANIZATION…..THE TOP DOGS, THE HIERARCHY……..?????? That is no doubt a completely different entity than what you see at face value….like everything else is…
Bloodsoaked, sorry, that I am so cynical and I mean no disrespect to the people on the charitable side of the institution..there is way more to all of this than meets the eye.
I see this as an attempt to call out guilt and there is plenty of that to go around. That is why I ask who are the owners of the Knights of Columbus….????
Boo Hoo..who are the Knights of Columbus???…Someone should look into that…..ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME, THE NEW WORLD HOARDERS.