Cummings, Tierney Urge Issa to Subpoena Documents from FHFA on Principal Reduction
Washington, DC (Jan. 18, 2012) – Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, Ranking Member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and Committee Member John F. Tierney sent a letter today to Chairman Darrell Issa requesting that he issue a subpoena to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) compelling the production of all documents associated with its analyses of whether mortgage loan modifications with principal reductions should be offered by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
During questioning from Tierney at a Committee hearing on November 16, 2011, FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco testified that programs to reduce mortgage principal do not serve the long-term interests of taxpayers when compared to foreclosure. DeMarco testified that FHFA had conducted analyses supporting this conclusion, and he committed under oath to provide materials relating to these analyses to the Committee.
On November 30, 2011, Cummings and all Democratic Members of the Committee sent a letter to DeMarco requesting that he provide these documents by December 9, 2011. Despite numerous written and oral follow-up requests, however, DeMarco has failed to provide them to date.
“Given Mr. DeMarco’s failure to produce to the Committee the documents he committed under oath to provide and the call by Federal Reserve officials for the implementation of loan modification programs that include principal reduction to address the ongoing housing crisis, we believe we are left with no option but to compel Mr. DeMarco’s compliance,” Cummings and Tierney wrote to Issa. “For these reasons, we request that you issue a subpoena demanding these documents, or that you schedule a business meeting so Members may vote to authorize a subpoena in order to obtain these documents.”
Below is the full letter:
January 18, 2012
The Honorable Darrell E. Issa
Chairman
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Chairman Issa:
We write today to request that you issue a subpoena to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) compelling the production of all documents associated with its analyses of whether mortgage loan modifications with principal reductions should be offered by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. During a hearing before the Committee on November 16, 2011, the Acting Director of FHFA, Edward DeMarco, committed under oath to provide these materials to the Committee. Despite numerous written and oral follow-up requests, however, Mr. DeMarco has failed to provide them.
During the Committee’s hearing in November, Rep. John Tierney asked Mr. DeMarco whether he had determined, as a matter of policy, that it was preferable to foreclose on properties rather than offer loan modifications that include principal reductions, even if foreclosures resulted in greater losses to FHFA and U.S. taxpayers than would be associated with principal reductions. In response to Rep. Tierney’s question, Mr. DeMarco stated:
We have been through the analytics of the underwater borrowers at Fannie and Freddie, and looked at the foreclosure alternative programs that are available, and we have concluded that the use of principal reduction within the context of a loan modification is not going to be the least-cost approach for the taxpayer.
At the conclusion of his questioning, Rep. Tierney asked Mr. DeMarco to provide both the statutory authority for his claim that FHFA is prohibited from allowing principal reduction programs, as well as any analysis that FHFA conducted demonstrating that foreclosures always serve taxpayer interests when compared to principal reductions. Specifically, Rep. Tierney stated:
What you’re telling me flies in the face of all these people who have come up with a quite different idea. … I’d like you to do two things for the Committee if you would. First, I want you to identify anywhere in the statute that specifically prohibits you from developing principal reduction programs. … [S]econd, I’d like you to submit whatever analysis you have done that shows why reducing the principal on some mortgages is worse for the United States taxpayer than foreclosure.
In response to Rep. Tierney’s request, Mr. DeMarco committed under oath to provide these documents, stating: “We can provide that information as you suggested, Congressman.”
In order to follow-up on this request, all Democratic members of the Committee sent a letter to Mr. DeMarco on November 30, 2011, making clear what information he should provide to the Committee. The letter requested that he produce:
- “the statutory provision you believe prohibits the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) from allowing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to reduce mortgage principal in all cases”; and
- “the analysis you conducted, including the data you examined, demonstrating that principal reduction never serves the long-term interests of the taxpayer when compared to foreclosure.”
We requested that this information be provided by December 9, 2011, but Mr. DeMarco has failed to provide even a single document. Minority staff have made repeated inquiries to Mr. DeMarco’s staff about the status of the document production, but they have failed to provide any indication of when he plans to comply.
While Mr. DeMarco has failed to provide supporting documents demonstrating why a principal reduction program is not in the best interest of taxpayers, economists are increasingly announcing their support for such a program. For example, over the past several months, officials with the Federal Reserve have made strong public statements supporting principal reduction. On January 4, Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke issued a white paper to Congress that stated:
Principal reduction has the potential to decrease the probability of default (and thus the deadweight costs of foreclosure) and to improve migration between labor markets. Principal reduction may reduce the incidence of default both by improving a household’s financial position, and thus increasing its resilience to economic shocks, and by reducing the incentive to engage in “strategic” default (that is, to default solely based on the household’s underwater position rather than on the affordability of the payments).
On December 16, 2011, during a hearing before the Subcommittee on TARP, Financial Services and Bailouts of Public and Private Programs, the President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, William Dudley, also called for implementation of a targeted principal reduction program to bolster the nation’s economic recovery and serve the long-term interests of U.S. taxpayers. President Dudley explained:
[w]e think that you can devise a program that, for home buyers that have mortgages that are under water, to incent them to continue to pay on those mortgages by giving them some program of principal reduction. Obviously the devil’s in the details, so you have to have good program design. But we are confident that one can design a program, which would be net beneficial—net positive—to the taxpayer.
The recent statements in support of principal reduction issued by Chairman Bernanke and President Dudley follow similar public statements issued by Neil Barofsky, former Special Inspector General for TARP; Alan Blinder, former Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve; and Mark Zandi, Chief Economist, Moody’s Analytics.
Given Mr. DeMarco’s failure to produce to the Committee the documents he committed under oath to provide and the call by Federal Reserve officials for the implementation of loan modification programs that include principal reduction to address the ongoing housing crisis, we believe we are left with no option but to compel Mr. DeMarco’s compliance. For these reasons, we request that you issue a subpoena demanding these documents, or that you schedule a business meeting so Members may vote to authorize a subpoena in order to obtain these documents.
If you have any questions, please contact Lucinda Lessley at (202) 225-5051. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.
SOURCE: http://democrats.oversight.house.gov/
Copy of PDF letter below…
~
4closureFraud.org
~
Screw them!..our homes are paid for..because they committed hundreds of trillions in fraud off of our signatures and made hundreds of trillions off of that fraud and hid their profits and handed all of us the bill for all of their fraud…and they never recorded a legally enforceable lien..besides in order to reduce the principal or modify a loan your have to prove that your own it..and they can’t because legally they don’t…..and they never lent us any money…they never had any skin in the game…and as a result of the biggest financial coup de tat in American history…these sneaky crooks owe all of us hundreds of trillions in ill gotten gains..!
FHFA Acting Director De Marco is not acting to promote and preserve home ownership. He is acting in the best interests of the bank servicers that are foreclosing with fraudulent documents unjustly enriching themselves while De Marco protects their pillaging. Housing is directly tied to the health of the economy. There is zero evidence that investors and/or tax payers are better off under his warped policies. He will go down in history as the man that did the most to push America into a housing death spiral and adding years to economic recovery. Obama should do a recess appointment and get that grossly injurious man out of his ‘acting director’ position. Then he should be THOROUGHLY investigated for every decision he has made while in that position.
I agree with Charlie!!!!Occupy.
Analyses of principal reduction???? I wk in this industry and i would bet my paycheck there is not one. I have never ever seen a principal reduction by the banks. I have always wondered how a property that was worth $175,000 the owner was going to benefit from a modification on the first with a balance of $314,000 was helping? the payment was low enought, the rate was low enought but he would never be able to refi in his lifetime. The lender adds every fee imaginable, who is going to do anything about it??? How is giving a loan to an owner for $314,000 when the house is only worth $175,000 going to help the real estate market. All that needs to happen is some major medical situation. That modification amount has interest included so they are paying interest on top of interest but who is going to do something about it??? we would have a better chance calling “”” Ghost Busters”””. Lenders listen to no one.
A bankster lie that needs to be taken out back, and shot to death, is that principle reduction is “not in the interest of the taxpayers.” This is an absolutely insane statement considering the amount of money the “taxpayer” has already sacrificed for Wall Street! The “taxpayers”, if they actually had any say in the matter, would have the Banks obliterated, CEOs in leg irons and Fannie Mae would be entirely overhauled or destroyed,
NOT in the interest of the BANKSTERS! OCCUPY!