Florida Affidavit Follies from the Florida Default Law Group

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JOEL G. MABRY, et al,

Defendants.

THE COURT: Wells Fargo versus Joel Mabry and Rhonda Perryman-Mabry and others. There is an attorney present representing somebody, I guess, that’s not Wells Fargo, so if you’ll identify yourself, Mr. Osborne.

MR. Osborne: Yes, Your Honor. David Osborne for the Florida Default Law Group on behalf of the Wells Fargo Bank.

THE COURT: Okay. We’re here on your motion for summary judgment, Mr. Osborne. Did you receive a copy of the motion in opposition?

MR. Osborne: Yes, Your Honor. Essentially, it’s — I’m not going to challenge that — the case law. I assume counsel has correctly has presented these holdings and law as accurate. I was able to very, very briefly skim through, but only just now more closely read this. It appears that our affidavits will be — will need to be up dated, and so we will be rescheduling this hearing to conform with appellate case law in Florida.

THE COURT: Okay. I’m just making some notes here. So are you canceling the hearing at this time? What do you —

MR Osborne: Yes, Your Honor. It appears that there are — the plaintiff cannot — it appears — I’m sorry. Let me rephrase, Your Honor. Because we have not attached the business records to these affidavits of the amounts due and owing, I believe that defense has raised at least a reasonable argument as to why this should not go forward.

Read the entire transcript below…

4closureFraud

Florida Affidavit Follies from the Florida Default Law Group

Comments
One Response to “Florida Affidavit Follies from the Florida Default Law Group”
  1. Mortgagemalaise says:

    Sign of a turning tide?

Leave a Reply